Race Based Law is an insult to modernity, divides the populace, and produces ridiculous situations like this…
“A B.C. judge has warned that a “tsunami” of fake ‘Indigenous’ people are set to hit the Canadian court system, as offenders increasingly claim ‘Indigenous’ status in a bid to obtain lighter treatment.”
“A Tsunami is coming; driven by the desire of non-‘Indigenous’ people to get what they perceive to be the benefits of identifying as ‘Indigenous’,”
B.C. Provincial Court Judge David Patterson said in a decision… {Dec., 2024}.
https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcpc/doc/2024/2024bcpc29/2024bcpc29.html
“Patterson warned his fellow judges “to be alive to the issue of ‘Indigenous’ identity fraud” and begin demanding “proof” that offenders are “entitled to be sentenced as an ‘Indigenous’ person”.
{The irony here – and what ultimately turns this racist farce into a Monty Python skit – is that Canadian Indians and Inuit are ‘Indigenous’ to Mongolia and Siberia…}
“The decision was in regards to a Prince Rupert, B.C., pastor, Nathan Legault, who was convicted of several charges related to the sexual victimization of young girls under his supervision, including a conviction for the making of child pornography. But before the sentencing, Legault told the court he now self-identified as Métis, and should thus be subject to ‘Gladue Rights’ — a {discriminatory} system wherein judges are required to consider lighter and “alternate” sentences for ‘Indigenous’ offenders.
“First written into the Criminal Code in 1995 and then encoded in the 1999 Supreme Court decision ‘R v. Gladue’, these principles were explicitly introduced to reduce rates of ‘Indigenous’ incarceration by requiring judges to consider “the circumstances of Aboriginal offenders” before applying a legal sanction.
https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1695/index.do
{‘What Happened To Legal Equality?’
“In attempting to cope with the high proportion of aboriginals in Canadian prisons, Parliament and our judicial leadership have unfortunately resorted to differential treatment based on Race/heritage. It’s called ‘Gladue’, after the name of the Supreme Court case. The Court, instead of doing its duty and tossing out the discriminatory legislation, sided with ‘aboriginal exceptionalism’, and extended Segregation into court sentencing…”
https://endracebasedlaw.wordpress.com/2024/04/04/what-happened-to-legal-equality/ }
“‘R v. Gladue’ states specifically that the principle is “not to be taken as a means of automatically reducing the prison sentence of aboriginal offenders” {But that’s pretty much what’s been happening}. The decision also says that it’s “unreasonable to assume that aboriginal peoples do not believe in the importance of traditional sentencing goals”.
“Nevertheless, lighter sentences and more ready bail are often the effect — to the point where the ‘Gladue’ process has been criticized by ‘Indigenous’ women’s groups for favouring Indigenous male offenders at the expense of ‘Indigenous’ female victims.
{‘Expanding Discriminatory Legal Treatment’
“First, they instituted ‘Gladue’, which provided for lighter sentences for aboriginal criminals; now, considering that most violence against aboriginal women comes from aboriginal men, they are proposing STIFFER sentences for aboriginal men. Racism is always illogical. A Constitution that enables this kind of racial discrimination in law is a Constitution that’s not worth the paper it’s written on…”
https://canadiansforlegalequality.wordpress.com/2019/06/19/expanding-discriminatory-legal-treatment/ }
“The victims deserve to have someone advocating for them in court just as much as the perpetrator”,
Dawn Lavell-Harvard, president of the Native Women’s Association of Canada, told ‘National Post’ in 2016.
“In the case of Legault, the judge would note that the pastor’s claim to ‘Indigenous’ status was incredibly tenuous. Legault didn’t provide DNA evidence or even genealogical research, and had never previously identified as ‘Indigenous’ before being arrested on criminal charges.
“All he had was what Patterson deemed “family lore”; a phone call to the Ontario Métis Family Record Center which allegedly confirmed that “one of his 16 great-great-grandparents was a member of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy”.
“Despite no other proof, Patterson was required to conduct a 22-point analysis {paid for by taxpayers} of how Legault’s tenuous Métis heritage might have contributed towards him becoming a child sex offender. This included probing whether he had ever experienced poverty, whether he was affected by the “legacy of sex discrimination in the ‘Indian Act’,” and whether he might be suffering from the “intergenerational impacts of colonialism and displacement”.
“Mr. Legault has recently self-identified as Métis – due to his having a paternal great-great-grandmother who was a member of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, also known as Six Nations (Iroquois) of Montreal – and while he grew up with his parents and siblings in an environment devoid of the knowledge or influence of Indigenous culture, it is not an appropriate role for sentencing judges or counsel to police who is and who is not Indigenous {!?!}. The Legault family has chosen to join the Painted Feather Woodland Métis in Bancroft, Ontario. In light of his self-identification as Métis, ‘Gladue’ factors apply.”
–‘R. v. Legault, 2024 BCPC 29 (CanLII)’
https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcpc/doc/2024/2024bcpc29/2024bcpc29.html
“Only after an intensive examination of Legault’s entire life up to that point did Patterson conclude
“there is nothing to equate Mr. Legault’s life experience with that of the Métis people specifically or ‘Indigenous’ peoples in Canada generally”.
“There is no evidence that Mr. Legault having a paternal great‑great‑grandmother who was a member of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy in any way, shape, or form, translated into Mr. Legault attaining a lower education, less income, or contributed to his child pornography addiction”,
wrote the judge.
“Legault would end up getting off with a sentence that was so lenient that Patterson wrote that he was “uncomfortable” with it, and adopted the proposal “reluctantly”.
“Legault faces no jail time. For two years he must be home by 5 p.m. on weekdays, and is confined to house arrest on weekends, in addition to other restrictions.
“Nevertheless, it wasn’t because Legault claimed to be Métis. As the decision wrote,
“his self-identification as Indigenous … (does) not lessen his moral blameworthiness”.
“Instead, Patterson wrote that Legault’s light sentence was due to another limiting aspect of Canadian sentencing law. The Crown and defence presented the court with a “joint submission on sentence” after Legault pleaded guilty to two charges in exchange for the Crown dropping three others.
{Which brings up the racist bias that now seems to exist in politicized prosecutor’s offices. The legal industry’s systemic racism – being taught in law schools – is making its appearance in ALL aspects of the Canadian judicial system, federal and provincial. See below…}
“In order to toughen the light sentence that was suggested by prosecutors, the judge would have needed to prove that its application would throw
“the administration of justice into disrepute or otherwise be contrary to the public interest”.
{Well, it was both.}
“Since that wasn’t “a certainty” {?}, Patterson wrote,
“I am resisting the urge to re-engineer the joint submission and I reluctantly endorse the joint submission”.
–‘Judge warns of ‘tsunami’ of offenders faking Indigenous status to get lighter sentences’,
Tristin Hopper, National Post, Mar. 15, 2024
See also:
‘Aboriginal Judge Awards Aboriginal Sentencing Discount’ (Gladue) {Feb.12, 2026}:
“This approach may look like that would be giving ‘Indigenous’ women special treatment in the sentencing process. I am fine with that – and I would say it is about time”,
Judge Alexander Wolf, who also identifies as ‘Indigenous’ and is a member of the Kwikwasut’inuxw Haxwa’mis ‘First Nation’, wrote.”
https://endracebasedlaw.ca/2026/02/12/aboriginal-judge-awards-aboriginal-sentencing-discount/
‘Another Race-Based Judicial Injustice’ (Gladue) {Sept.11, 2023}:
“This isn’t about Aboriginal babies. The same light sentencing would have applied had he killed a ‘White’ baby because he is an Aboriginal, and is therefore entitled to preferential sentencing in Canada’s racist courts…
“Every child matters in Canada… Except for tortured and murdered ‘indigenous’ babies.”
https://endracebasedlaw.ca/2023/09/11/another-race-based-judicial-injustice/
‘Another Violent Aboriginal Criminal Gets Off Easy’ (Gladue) {Jan.13, 2023}:
“More excuse-making for Aboriginal violence:
“Provincial court Judge Harry Van Harten said the ‘generational trauma’ European society has caused to ‘Indigenous’ communities had to be addressed. Bobby Crane slashed the throat of a visually impaired Calgary man during the morning rush hour. Sending an offender who slashed the throat of a total stranger on a CTrain to a federal prison would do no good for either the perpetrator or society, a judge said Monday.”
https://endracebasedlaw.ca/2023/01/13/another-violent-aboriginal-criminal-gets-off-easy/
‘Law Societies Undermining Canada’ (New Brunswick) {Feb.18, 2026}:
“Lawyers are indoctrinated with the Aboriginal industry ‘mandatory’ narrative in law school, from which they derive massive financial gain. No wonder the lawyer/judges in our courts always rule in favour of Aboriginals – and against the rest of the people of Canada. Check out this ideological statement – almost copied word-for-word from Aboriginal Industry propaganda – from the ‘Law Society of New Brunswick’ {It should be noted that their foolish ‘position’ will inevitably mean the end of Canada. P.S. They also continue to spread the lie of the 215 ‘graves’}.”
https://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2026/02/18/law-societies-undermining-canada/
‘Lawyer vs. Law Society: Kamloops ‘Graves’ Libel’ (B.C.) {Mar.14, 2025}:
“B.C. lawyers shouldn’t face residential school ‘denialism’ accusations for telling the truth. We have now reached the stage where a large body of lawyers are more interested in burnishing their ‘Indigenous’ bona fides than they are in the truth.”
https://endracebasedlaw.ca/2025/03/14/lawyer-vs-law-society-kamloops-graves-libel/
‘The Indoctrination of Alberta Lawyers’ (The ‘Path’) {Feb.6, 2023}:
“Alberta lawyers voted to retain a mandatory, and blatantly one-sided, Aboriginal Industry indoctrination course imposed on them by the Law Society. None of this is surprising, since one of the main financial beneficiaries of the billion-dollar, court-created Aboriginal Industry is the legal profession…”
https://endracebasedlaw.ca/2023/02/06/the-indoctrination-of-alberta-lawyers/
♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
Websites:
END RACE BASED LAW inc. Canada
https://endracebasedlaw.wordpress.com/
ERBL Canada News Feed
https://endracebasedlawcanadanews.wordpress.com/
♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
Facebook:
ERBL Main Page
https://www.facebook.com/ENDRACEBASEDLAW
ERBL Canada News Feed
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ENDRACEBASEDLAWnewsCanada
♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
TWITTER (X): https://twitter.com/ERBLincCanada
♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
Petition to END RACE BASED LAW
https://endracebasedlaw.wordpress.com/petition-canada/
JOIN US IN THE FUTURE OF A UNIFIED CANADA
END RACE BASED LAW Daily News Canada 