‘Now, It’s Quebec’s Turn’

The all-out assault on Canadian sovereignty from the Aboriginal Industry rolls on, with dollar signs blinding both Aboriginal leadership and Canada’s Legal Industry to the fact that they are undermining – and ultimately, killing – ‘the goose that laid the golden eggs’…

Nearly 40 ‘Indigenous’ {self-identified} ‘land guardians’, alongside hereditary and traditional chiefs {Aboriginal royalty}, have filed a lawsuit seeking formal recognition of their rights over a vast stretch of Quebec. Their legal challenge aims to curb industrial logging and ensure the protection of their traditional way of life. 

Truck carrying lumber drives through Atikamekw ‘Nation’ ‘sovereign’ land (PHOTO-Benjamin Shingler)

{Which most of them no longer practice; hence, all of the Aboriginals on government assistance – ironically enough, paid for at least partly out of the very resource revenues they are trying to curtail.}

The application, filed in Quebec Superior Court last week, covers a territory spanning between the St. Lawrence River, the Saint-Maurice River valley and the forested areas of northern Mauricie, according to the document.

The plaintiffs are specifically asking the court to declare all supply guarantees and intervention permits granted to forestry companies null and void.

This legal move follows a summer of tensions marked by numerous blockades across the ancestral lands of several ‘Indigenous’ ‘nations’.

{NOTE: Canadian Aboriginals are ‘Indigenous’ to Mongolia and Siberia. They also are NOT ‘nations’ in any modern sense of the word. They are tribes, Bands, and often simply extended families.}

These actions were spearheaded by MAMU ‘First Nation’ — a collective of ‘land guardians’ from the Atikamekw and Innu ‘nations’ — to protest a proposed overhaul of the province’s forestry regime.

{MAMU ‘First Nation’ – Another taxpayer-funded lobbying organization: An alliance of hereditary chiefs and land defenders from the Atikamekw, Innu, and Abenaki ‘nations’ in Quebec; meaning “together” in Innu and Atikamekw, the group focuses on protecting unceded territory, exercising sovereignty, and managing traditional lands”.}

Although the Coalition Avenir Québec government ultimately abandoned the reform, the plaintiffs decided to go to court {If they had to pay for it themselves, they’d think twice. This plethora of Aboriginal court cases is simply fraud enabled by Aboriginal Industry lawyers and judges – and government funding – enabling massive profits for the legal industry and Aboriginal elites}.

There is a lack of trust toward the government. This move is also a warning to other potential land developers, such as mining companies“,

said Dave Petiquay, one of the {so-called} ‘land guardians’ involved in the claim.

He said that since the document was filed, other Innu and Atikamekw chiefs have expressed their interest to join the ‘movement’ {for unearned and undeserved profit}.

We are not against forestry workers, but permits must be issued better and we must be consulted“,

said Petiquay, who is a member of the Atikamekw community of Wemotaci.

He said he is doing it for “future generations, including non-‘Indigenous’ ones, but also for animals, which can’t speak for themselves“.

{Self-righteous B.S. – and getting paid for it…}

Quebec’s Ministry of Natural Resources and Forests did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication.

The plaintiffs’ argument is essentially based on ‘Section 35’ of the “Constitution Act”, which protects {Racist} ancestral or treaty rights and imposes the ‘duty to consult’.

The document details the history of the occupation of the {claimed but unproven former} Nehirowisiw Aski territory and supports the fact that this ‘occupation’ {on land for which they’ve been financially remunerated for decades} is “spiritual, political, and economic in nature” and that it was established {by theft and murder?} long before the arrival of the first European explorers.,

It also revisits the role of the ‘land guardians’, who are responsible for ensuring the conservation of resources {Responsible to whom?}.

The plaintiffs maintain that government authorizations granted to the logging industry cannot apply to the territories targeted by the claim.

The Crown does not hold the beneficial interest in the exploitation of resources on these lands and could not validly grant exploitation rights to third parties without the consent of the land guardians“, {Nonsense}

the document reads.

As a result, the forest management plans issued by Quebec for these territories are “incompatible” with the plaintiffs’ exclusive right of use and control {Which they don’t have. They are NOT sovereign and they do NOT have a veto – See below}.

That is the reason they are seeking to have certain sections of Quebec’s “Sustainable Forest Development Act” declared inoperative.

…”

–‘Atikamekw and Innu leaders file lawsuit over ancestral land rights in Quebec’,

CBC News, Feb. 24, 2026

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/atikamekw-and-innu-leaders-lawsuit-ancestral-land-rights-quebec-9.7103041

See also:

In Case You Missed It – No Aboriginal Veto, Says Supreme Court (Resource Veto):

Two Supreme Court of Canada decisions made it abundantly clear that, while the federal government has a duty to consult, that does not mean that ‘First Nations’ can veto a project. This week, just days after the new NDP government said it would work to implement a declaration that ostensibly gives ‘First Nations’ {Indian tribes} in B.C. a veto over projects like the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled no such veto exists.”

https://endracebasedlaw.ca/2025/12/06/in-case-you-missed-it-no-aboriginal-veto-says-supreme-court/

Quebecers Opposed To Special Rights for Aboriginals (Poll) {Dec.21, 2020}:

“There should be no ‘special rights’ for any group of Canadians…but Quebecers agreeing with this is somewhat ironic. It would seem that what’s ‘good for the goose’ isn’t ‘good for the gander’…

Quebecers think it’s important for ‘Indigenous’ people and non-‘Indigenous’ people to have the same rights. They are opposed to special or additional rights that certain politicians seem to want to grant to ‘First Nations’.

https://canadiansforlegalequalityblog.wordpress.com/2020/12/21/quebecers-opposed-to-special-rights-for-aboriginals/

♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠

#ENDRACEBASEDLAWCANADA

Websites:
END RACE BASED LAW inc. Canada
https://endracebasedlaw.wordpress.com/

ERBL Canada News Feed
https://endracebasedlawcanadanews.wordpress.com/
♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
Facebook:
ERBL Main Page
https://www.facebook.com/ENDRACEBASEDLAW

ERBL Canada News Feed
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ENDRACEBASEDLAWnewsCanada

♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠

TWITTER (X)https://twitter.com/ERBLincCanada

♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
Petition to END RACE BASED LAW
https://endracebasedlaw.wordpress.com/petition-canada/

JOIN US IN THE FUTURE OF A UNIFIED CANADA

Thank you from ERBL inc. Canada

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.