Almost everything she said was correct – if somewhat exaggerated – and can be historically verified. Only those children in need of ‘safe spaces’ could find anything wrong in her remarks. Hope she wins her riding. B.C. needs lots of people like her, especially if even people like Rustad are going to virtue-signal, rather than deal with reality…
“A B.C. ‘Conservative’ {Party} candidate awaiting the results of a recount that could determine who forms the provincial government used {what some refer to as} a ‘racist slur’ to describe ‘Indigenous’ {sic} Peoples during an election-night interview.
{NOTE: Canadian Aboriginals are ‘Indigenous’ to Siberia and Mongolia.]
“Marina Sapozhnikov, who finished only 23 votes behind the NDP’s Dana Lajeunesse in ‘Juan De Fuca-Malahat’, said that before Europeans came to North America, ‘First Nations’ {Canadian Indian} Peoples
“didn’t have any sophisticated laws. They were savages. They fought each other all the time”.
“When the Vancouver Island University student interviewing Sapozhnikov challenged the candidate, she replied:
“Not 100% savages, maybe 90% savages.”
“During the hour-long interview, a recording of which was given to Postmedia late Thursday, Sapozhnikov spoke about her concerns with ‘Indigenous’ history courses being taught in B.C. universities, her view that B.C.’s adoption of the ‘UN Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act’ renders non-‘Indigenous’ British Columbians “second-class citizens” {which it does}, and said that
“90% of ‘Indigenous’ people use drugs”.
{This one can’t be verified but if she’s referring to urban Aboriginals, she’s probably not far off…}
“Sapozhnikov elaborated on those views in a 30-minute phone interview Friday with Postmedia, saying Canadian university courses “only teach a one-sided story” when it comes to ‘Indigenous’ history {That’s for sure!}.
“B.C. ‘Conservative’ {Party} leader John Rustad refused an interview request but said in an emailed statement Friday he was “appalled and deeply saddened” by Sapozhnikov’s comments {Why? You’re supposed to be an alternative, not the same old B.S.}. He said her
“remarks do not reflect the values of our Party or the vision we have for a united British Columbia, and we are taking this matter seriously”.
{Well, then a lot of British Columbians voted under the misconception that this was going to change. This is the same rhetoric we hear from the NDP government.}
“Her words are not only inaccurate {? Nonsense. Most of what she said is true} but profoundly harmful {The truth is now “harmful”? Sounds like Trudeau}, painting a distorted picture of the communities I have worked alongside for many years”,
Rustad said.
“Our Party stands for unity, respect, and reconciliation with ‘Indigenous’ peoples {Same as the NDP}. We must continue to ‘move forward’ {? Regress} by embracing ‘truth’ {?} and compassion — not harmful misconceptions that only divide us further.”
“But Rustad made no indication he was considering her removal from the Party.
{He’d be quite the hypocrite if he did, after his experience with the B.C. ‘Liberal’ Party…}
“Sapozhnikov is key to the ‘Conservatives’ hopes for forming government. Her Vancouver Island riding, Juan De Fuca-Malahat, is the most-watched district in the province following last weekend’s tight election results, as B.C. waits to learn who will form the next provincial government. Depending on the result of this weekend’s recount in that riding and others, Sapozhnikov could be elected as an MLA – which could be crucial to helping the ‘Conservatives’ form government — potentially a majority.
“Former Vancouver Sun columnist Stephen Hume, a journalism professor at VIU, had assigned every student in class to contact a different candidate on Vancouver Island and ask if they could accompany them on election night as the results came in, interview them, and report on it {Great project…}.
“Student Alyona Latsinnik contacted Sapozhnikov by email the day before election day and asked if she could “report live from the location of your office while the results are being announced”. The candidate replied that the student would be “very welcome to join” their team’s election night party and provided the address.
“On election night, Latsinnik asked Sapozhnikov a series of questions, and they had a wide-ranging conversation. Latsinnik did not ask Sapozhnikov about ‘Indigenous’ issues or {One-way} ‘reconciliation’. But the conversation veered in that direction when the candidate asked Latsinnik about her studies and she replied she was taking ‘Indigenous’ studies.
“It’s all a lie” {!},
Sapozhnikov said.
“What do you mean?”
Latsinnik asked.
“They rewrite ‘Indigenous’ history”,
{Including pretending that they’re ‘Indigenous’}
Sapozhnikov said.
“They make them some enlightened people {The mythological ‘Noble savage’}. They didn’t have an alphabet.”
“On Friday, Sapozhnikov, a retired family doctor, told Postmedia that she worries that Canada’s university courses on ‘Indigenous’ history
“only teach a one-sided story, and it does have some agenda in it”.
{Yes – the billion-dollar Aboriginal Industry’s narrative…}
“Asked what agenda she meant and who was behind it, she replied:
“I really don’t know what the purpose is {Money, control and, most importantly, revenge}, and I don’t want to attribute motives to people. But if somebody doesn’t represent the whole story, then you should ask those people who teach it what the agenda is and what their motives are. But all I can say is that certain things don’t add up. {!}”
“She clarified that she did not mean that ‘Indigenous’ Peoples in the present age are “savages”, but “hundreds of years ago”.
{When many were cannibals…}
“I think we need to speak with actually ‘Indigenous’ people and find out what they think about it. I try to speak with some of them and they’re not, they avoid this conversation”,
Sapozhnikov said.
“Later, Sapozhnikov said:
“When I used to see ‘Indigenous’ people as patients, I wasn’t able to talk to them. Because they don’t talk. As soon as I’d ask just, sometimes, very innocent question, they just shut up. They don’t talk.”
“At one point in the election-night interview, Sapozhnikov told Latsinnik:
“If you want me to tell you what I think, you go ahead and print it, I don’t care”, adding that if her professor would “dare to invite” her to come speak to her class, she would do it {Good for you! We need more of this…}.
“Near the end of her Friday interview with Postmedia, Sapozhnikov said she was “glad that we’re having this conversation”.
“It’s all very good; it will create some kind of discussion”,
Sapozhnikov said.
“We need a discussion to happen on a personal level, this needs to be talked about.”
-‘B.C. Conservative candidate uses racist slur to describe Indigenous Peoples on election night’,
Dan Fumano, Vancouver Sun, Oct. 25, 2024
https://www.conservativebc.ca/marina
See also:
‘The ‘Indigenization’ of British Columbia Law’ (UNDRIP) {July 15, 2022}:
“Canadian governments are busy establishing a legal framework where Canadian law becomes subservient to the United Nations ‘ Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’, regardless of the wishes of the Canadian people. British Columbia – along with the federal government — are foolishly leading the way in this undermining of Canadian democracy:
“A small bill with far-reaching implications. ‘Bill 29’ ran a mere three pages, including cover and explanatory notes. It constituted one of the first substantive moves by the government to amend provincial laws to incorporate the ‘principles’ of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. ‘Bill 29’ added a clause that said every
“Act and regulation must be construed as being consistent with the Declaration on the ‘Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act’.”
“The latter being the Act whereby two years ago, the legislature unanimously enshrined the 46 articles of the UN Declaration and set in motion an action plan to incorporate them into provincial law.”
‘The Genocide of the Dorset’:
“The Thule (ancestors of today’s Inuit), originally from Siberia, were gradually expanding across the Arctic, displacing the older, aboriginal Dorset people. By roughly 1200 AD, the Dorset had vanished, killed off in warfare with the Thule… Inuit oral traditions tell of how the Dorset were a gentle people without bows and arrows, and thus easy to kill and drive away…”
https://endracebasedlaw.com/2019/08/05/the-genocide-of-the-dorset/
‘What Happened To The ‘Neutrals’?’:
“This is the tribe that occupied southwestern Ontario until the 1650s, when fellow Iroquois tribes from what is now the U.S. rendered them extinct. In modern terminology, they were ‘victims of genocide’…”
https://endracebasedlaw.wordpress.com/2016/08/23/what-happened-to-the-neutrals/
‘The Lachine Massacre’:
“The Canadian people, and most certainly Canadian children, are almost continually subjected to Aboriginal Industry propaganda, a pillar of which is the historical narrative whereby murderous, thieving Europeans impose ‘genocide’ and violence on the innocent, saintly and otherwise virtuous aboriginal inhabitants. While not wishing to belabour the point, we still feel compelled to occasionally present some historical balance…”
https://endracebasedlaw.wordpress.com/2016/08/04/the-lachine-massacre/
♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
Websites:
END RACE BASED LAW inc. Canada
https://endracebasedlaw.wordpress.com/
ERBL Canada Daily News Feed Blog
https://endracebasedlawcanadanews.wordpress.com/
♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
Facebook:
ERBL Main Page
https://www.facebook.com/ENDRACEBASEDLAW
ERBL Canada Daily News Feed Blog
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ENDRACEBASEDLAWnewsCanada
♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
TWITTER (X): https://twitter.com/ERBLincCanada
♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
Petition to END RACE BASED LAW
https://endracebasedlaw.wordpress.com/petition-canada/
JOIN US IN THE FUTURE OF A UNIFIED CANADA
END RACE BASED LAW Daily News Canada 